Sunday, March 29, 2026

Father, Forgive Them for They Know Not What They Do

In the psyche ward of the county jail I met Michael about two years ago, when he arrived and I joined the Catholic jail ministry. Cognitively he was ok, but very depressed, quiet. He only asked: "How do you get rid of guilt?" I have seen him a few times since as we rotate to different sections of the jail. He would attend our Catholic communion service every week, but with rotating leaders. He seemed different this past Friday. He was walking briskly, exercising. He was serene and peaceful as he told us his sentencing will be June 5 and he expects to get 30 years. I wondered what he could have done. In prayer he was different. Quiet but peaceful. Good eye contact. In the petitions he prayed "that all incarcerated people could leave jail better than they entered." That touched me and I mentioned it. He spoke sincerely of hope and how important it is. I marveled: You are looking at 30 so calmly; you must have hope. We discussed the Passion of Christ and he noted that Judas redeemed himself somewhat at least by his remorse. My partner leading the prayer correctly contrasted Judas and Peter: Peter received pardon, Judas did not. I agreed with that, of course, but did affirm Michael's point: the contrition of Judas was not without value, I shared the theological opinion, neither renounced nor affirmed by the Church officially, that Christ appears to each of us, sinners, at death, showing his wounds sustained for our pardon, and offers his mercy. And so, while we Catholics believe in a hell populated, at least by demons, we do not know with certitude that any human is there, even Judas. 

Later I learned his crime. In a schizophrenic state, fighting about household chores, he stabbed his mother and father to death. Now I understood the guilt. I was amazed by his newfound peace. I have been thinking about him since then. I see this as a real miracle. A GREAT miracle, if quiet and hidden.

I am happy with our Catholic mission. Jails do always welcome religious visitors as we can give them headaches with our enthusiasms and good intentions. But we are welcomed by the officers. We are simple, compliant, disciplined, obedient and objective. We do a simple service: read Scripture, receive communion, discuss the readings. We do NOT involve ourselves personally with inmates. Priest comes monthly for confessions. Jail rules are strict. We are there too share our Catholic faith, with the efficacious Word and Sacrament. We do not reveal last our last names. Do not bring in pens, rosaries, phones. Any piece of paper must be approved by the officer. We rotate so the inmates meet different people every week. It is not about ME, but the simple, clear objectivity of the communion rite.

It was this simple, steady objectivity, I assume, that assisted the miracle of conversion of Michael.

The jail chaplain is a muscular, tattooed, no-nonsense drill sergeant type, with a tender heart. Our leader, an ex-marine, worked for years in UPS management like myself. The jail, the military, UPS and Catholicism are alike: a clear, simple, masculine objectivity of form, rules, protocols. This is not about feelings, relationships, therapy. There is discipline, purpose, accountability, seriousness of intent. Jail is serious stuff, life and death, hard and objective; Catholicism is serious stuff, life and death, hard and objective.

Michael will be moving on to the state prison, a dark place, worse than the local jail. Let's pray for him going forward: that his own peace be preserved; and also that he be a light to others there in his quiet, meek manner.

God, bless, protect and strengthen Michael. Grant that the incarcerated be drawn to you.


Saturday, March 28, 2026

Top Catholic Intellects of the 20th Century

Indulge, dear Reader, Fleckinstein's compulsion to rework top-ten lists. Our criteria here will be: fidelity to our Catholic legacy; range of influence; depth, breath and creativity of erudition; and holiness in personal life. With an exception, we identify groups, nor individuals.

10. One of a Kind: Avery Cardinal Dulles. A personal favorite of mine as he taught me, he is the only solitary on this list. He stood largely alone...like Athanasius against the Arians, like Marlon Brando/Terry Malloy against Johnny Friendly and his thugs (On the Waterfront), like Gary Cooper in High Noon, like Henry Fonda (in 12 Angry Men), like Gregory Peck, whom he resembled, (To Kill a Mockingbird)...against the theological progressivism that prevailed through the 1980-90s. Named a Cardinal for his work, he earned the respect and affections of legions of intellectual antagonists, including in his own Jesuit order, by his brilliance, vast erudition, ecumenical sensitivity, quiet charm, humility and unspoken holiness. His theological method and style is continued, with more flair and a slightly better vocabulary, by his younger colleague, Fr. Tom Guarino of Seton Hall. Dulles was not entirely alone: he worked closely in the Catholic-Evangelical dialogue with key figures Neuhaus, Colson, Reno and others.

9. Popular Spiritual Writers: Baron von Hugel (largely unknown early 20th century expert on mysticism), Henri Nouwen, (early) Thomas Merton (of The Seven Story Mountain, later 1960s Merton of the Catholic Left and dialogue with the East not so much,) Carlo Caretto, St. Charles de Focault, Romano Guardini,  and Walter Ciszek S.J. Important non-Catholic voices would be C.S. Lewis, Etty Hellison, Simone Weil, Abraham Heschel, Martin Buber. Not included here are widely popular thinkers who are dissonant with fundamental Catholic principles: Richard Rohr, James Martin S.J., and Joan Chittister. 

8.Biblical Scholars:  Especially in the build up to Vatican II: Raymond Brown,  Joseph Fitzmyer, John McKenzie, Cardinal Bea, Joseph Ratzinger and more recently Scott Hahn and Brant Pitre. These have all brought academic study of the Bible more clearly into Catholic thought.

7. American Communio School of Theology: David L Schindler, David C Schindler, Antonio Lopez, Nick Healy, Michael Hanby, Adrian Walker and others.  These bring the Communio theology of John Paul, Benedict and Balthasar into conversation with our American culture.

6. Evangelists: Fulton Sheen, Fr. Patrick Peyton and Bishop Robert Barron. Sheen and Barron are first rate theologians, but these three are remarkable for their vast influence. In a different, lay key we note Frank Sheed. 

5. Holy Women: Mother Theresa, Dorothy Day, Catherine Doherty, Madeleine Delbrel, Caryll Houselander, Elizabeth Leseur, St. Elizabeth of the Trinity.  Non-academics, these women lived lives of heroism and holiness, often very close to the poor and suffering,  as they exercised immense influence through their communities, thought and writings.  Adrienne von Speyr is a special, controversial mystic and close collaborator with Balthasar. Ralph Martin considers her to be gravely pathological; Balthasarian true belivers, myself included, see her as immensely important. 

4. Lay Philosophers: Jacques and Raissa Maritain, Maurice Blondel, Etienne Gilson, Dietrich von Hildebrandt, Edith Stein (St. Theresa Benedicta of the Cross), G.K. Chesterton, Rene Girard, Gil Baile, Remi Brague, John Finnis, Germain Grizez, Robert George, George Weigel, Louis Depre, William May, Robert George, Charles Taylor, Alasdair McIntyre, Gabriel Marcel, Paul Ricoeur, Peter Kreft, Augusto del Noce, Ivan Illich, Schumacher, Karl Stern. Adjacent to, coextensive with and co-inherent with theology, these critically engaged contemporary thought, drawing largely from Thomism and Personalism. It is notable that among these 25 there is not a single priest (excepting the laicized Illich.)  The clergy dominate however in theology. A special case: Fr. Stanley Jaki, priest-scientist-theologian. 

3. Periti at Vatican II: De Lubac, Danielou, Congar, Boyer, Chenu, Phillips, Ratzinger, Courtney Murray and John Osterreicher.  These greatly influenced the Council and went on to interpret it in continuity with tradition. Fr. Phillips is not known globally as a theologian but was the diplomat who navigated the documents to find common ground and virtual episcopal consensus. Garrigou-Lagrange deserves mention as a conservative voice that was decisively countervailed. Other influential thinkers, after the Council, pursued a progressive direction which had harmful effects in their followers: Haring, Kung, Baum, Schillebeeckx, and others.

2. Founders of Lay Renewal Movements: Luigi Giussani, Kiko Arguello, Chiara Lubich, Ralph Martin and Collaborators (Cardinal Suenens, Steve Clark and others). These articulated distinctive, creative but Catholic-loyal spiritualities that inform the Church of the new century. Influential in a different lay movement, liberation theology, we can include Gustavo Gutierrez  who worked to keep it within the boundaries of Catholicism. 

1. St. Pope John Paul, Pope Benedict, Hans Urs von Balthasar. Taken together, their work rivals that of Thomas, Augustine or entire schools of the fathers and doctors. It defines our Catholicism of the years to come.

That is actually 80, not 10.  (Ratzinger shows up in three groupings.) Each an utterly distinctive synthesis of intellectual brilliance, loyalty to Christ and his Church, holiness of life, and wide influence. Few remain with us. Imagine their conversation in heaven! A conversation in which we share as we consider their lives and read their writings! 

Pray for us, you wise and holy ones,

that we may receive, cherish, defend, enhance, and above all hand on

the legacy you have left us!

This list is hardly exhaustive: it excludes literary, scientific and political figures. Who has been ignored or overrated here, dear Reader? Your comments are welcome!

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Best Day of the Year: March 25

 Most overrated: Christmas, December 25.  Most underrated: 9 months earlier, Annunciation, March 25.

Christmas is rich in sentiment, nostalgia, custom, tradition, gift giving, song, fun, friendship and family affection. It is brutal for the lonely, the mentally ill, the broken hearted.  It is not the time when God became incarnate. That happened 9 months previous, when this unique person, the God-Man, was conceived in the Virgin Mary by the Holy Spirit.

My favorite holydays are the bookends of Jesus' life on earth: his conception and Pentecost, when he sent the Holy Spirit, the conclusion of his mission on earth. Between those definitive points, we have: birth, baptism/desert/public appearance, passion/death, Resurrection, 40 days of appearances, and ascension. If I had to rate them: 1. Annunciation. 2. Pentecost. 3. Resurrection.  4. Passion/death. 5. Baptism/Public. 6. Appearances. 7. Birth. 

How much difference between Jesus, or any one of us, at one week old and at one week before birth? Very, very little. Same little creature. There is a change in place. The change is accidental, geographical, extrinsic. How much change pre- and post- conception? Absolute! From nothing into something. Creatio ex nihilo. 

I will be 79 years old on my birthday, Aug. 20, 2026. I was born Aug. 20, 1947. But that date is not as important as 9 months previous, Nov. 20, 1946 or so, when I came into being out of nothing.

Mary's Yes, her Fiat, in response to the angel Gabriel was the SINGULAR greatest human decision, act, encounter, event. ALL of created being...the entirety of human history...was transformed in that one word: FIAT. Be it done to me according to your will.

When Mary said Yes, Jesus was conceived. Man and God were wed. They became "one flesh." God would not incarnate himself without consent. Mary was free. She represented the entire human race in our freedom, as did Adam and Eve in their primal decision, their assent to Lucifer, their betrayal of our heavenly Father.

When Mary said Yes, the deal was done. The covenant was consummated. The rest is history. Mary loved Jesus, and came to be loved by him...for the next 9 months, then the next 30 years, then the next 3 years, then the days from Friday afternoon to Sunday morning, than the next 40 days, then the next 10 days, and then afterwards in the companionship of John and the Church, and then assumed into heaven forever.

We, the Church, the entire human race, are drawn into that communion in love between the Trinity and the virgin. 

The Solitude of St. Joseph

Six days ago we celebrated the feast of St. Joseph. Consider his role in this drama. He is exterior to it. He has no direct role of intimacy in the conception of Jesus. He is adjacent. He is solitary. He is alone with God. He receives his own annunciation from the angel and is, like his spouse, obedient. His is a supporting role. He never says a word in Scripture. We know he was a carpenter. We know he cared for his family, tenderly. We know he did as directed from heaven. We know he died happily in the presence of Jesus and Mary. We know nothing about his friends or coworkers. We know nothing of his family, except that he was from the line of David. He is silent, invisible, anonymous, humble, protective, chaste. He is the quintessential man.

He is certainly the second holiest person who ever lived. He is second only to Mary who is in a category of her own: not God, but the most sanctified of creatures. He is also in a category of his own: not due to virtue or heroism or effort or will power. But because he lived in the intimate, chaste influence of Mary and Jesus. 

Who is third holiest? I go with John the Beloved Apostle who was so close to Jesus, even at the foot of the cross, and then close to Mary for many years. 

Conclusion

How do we become holy? 

Follow the example of Joseph and John. Stay close to Jesus and Mary. Open our hearts to their influence. That doesn't seem to be so hard!

Why I Like Italians So Much

 Top 12 reasons I love Italians:

12. We Irish and Italians like each other. We are different. We are both Catholic. Two things matter most: blood (family) and faith (Church). You are always Catholic. You can never be un-Catholic. You can be a porn star, a mafia hitman, a fascist or a Marxist...but you are still Catholic. Every Church is your Church, every priest is your priest, every hermit is praying for you. At your death, awaiting you is Christ and his Church.

11. Italian mafia movies: De Niro, Pacino, Pesci, Palminteri, Gandolfini and Liotta. Primal! Virile! Dramatic! Passionate!

10. (American) Italian food is the best! Everyone knows that!

9. Growing up, living, praying and working in urban NJ   I am always around Italians. They are fascinating. They act and talk like gangsters. But many are tender, holy, meek. I eventually outgrew my adolescent timidity and conviction that Italians are tougher than myself and my kind. Actually, a lot of Irish are awfully tough. (Not me!) They are loyal and vengeful. They either hate you enough to kill you on sight or love you enough to die for you, in a NY minute. 

8. Italian men are men and Italian women are women. No gay-affirmation! No gender ideology! "Patriarchy" is a good word. Camile Paglia can explain this better than me.

7. The luminous balance of the sacred and profane: the mafia boss who drives his wife to daily mass, the Italian bakery with pictures of the Sacred Heart, Francis of Assis, Sophia Loren, Padre Pio, and Claudia Cardinale.

6. The natural beauty of Italy: coastland, farms, fields, cities.

5, The History: Greeks, The Empire, Hannibal, Visigoths, Huns, the law, the architecture. You walk the streets of Rome and any cobblestone under your foot can be 2,500 years old.

4. The beauty of the Renaissance, artwork, statues, basilicas, Churches. 

3. Church history: relics of Peter, Paul, virgins, martyrs, popes, mystics, hermits. I am "Roman Catholic"...not Jersey City Catholic or Orange, NJ Catholic. 

2. Italians are to holiness what Kenyans are to marathons or Irish to alcoholism. 90% of stigmatists are Italian. They just are passionate, intense, inflamed with love for Christ: Francis of Assis, Catherine of Siena, Padre Pio, Maria Gioretti, Gema Galganni, and So many others. They levitate, bilocate, die incorrupt, fight demons, heal miraculously, receive locutions and apparitions, and SO much more.

1. Sophia Loren.    (Full disclosure: I was only 14 years old, without defense, when I say her in El Cid. I lost my mind, broke my heart, and fell into terminal covetousness. I have never been right. At this point, my hope is that my encounter, directly with Christ, at my particular judgement and my cleansing in purgatory will set me right.   Actually, it is not just Sophia. It is all Italian women. It may be a stereotype, but I don't really care: If you are Italian and female your food is from heaven, your soul is that of a virgin/martyr, your body that of a pagan earth goddess, your heart that of a Madonna. Just sayin...)


Sunday, March 22, 2026

The Great, Inspiring, Historic Man/Woman Partnerships of Our Time

It is striking how many of the very best things that happened in the second half of the 20th century came from a collaboration of a man and a woman. Most of these were not romantic, sexual or spousal. They continued the classic Catholic, gendered-generosity-generativity of Benedict/Scholastica, Francis/Clare, Catherine of Siena/Raymond of Capua, Teresa of Avila/John of Cross, Francis de Sales/Jane de Chantal, Vincent de Paul/Louise de Marillac, Claude de la Colombiere/Margaret Mary Alacoque.

We start with the most significant.

St John Paul, St Mother Theresa of Calcutta, Saint Faustina.  

John Paul and Theresa were not close friends or collaborators. He harshly refused her request to retire to a life of prayer. In this he extended her agonizing dark night and intensified the depth of her holiness. In the broad scale of things, the two stand over the Church and world of this time as incomparable icons of maternity and paternity.

As far as we know, John Paul and Faustina never met each other. She died at the age of 33 in 1938 in Krakow. He moved to Krakow at the age of 18 in 1938.  They lived in proximity to each other. But more importantly, she was the recipient of the revelations from heaven of Christ's divine Mercy; John Paul later as Cardinal and Pope approved and spread this devotion. This was possibly the most powerful visitation from heaven to earth in the century.

Hans Urs von Balthasar and Adrienne von Speyr.

Balthasar is in a league with Augustine and Aquinas in his encyclopedic erudition, creative brilliance, and insight into our faith. He insisted that his own work was entirely a collaboration with Adrienne and that her own work greatly exceeded his own in significance. He considered her to the greatest mystic since St. Theresa of Avila and St. John of the Cross. Their theological work, combined with that of John Paul and Benedict, defines Catholicism for the foreseeable centuries.

Kiko Arguello and Carmen Hernandez.

Together, these two founded the Neocatechumenal Way. They are clearly partners, although Kiko is a spiritual genius in the league of the greatest (Benedict, Francis, Dominic, Ignatius of Loyola) while Carmen was theologically trained and probably responsible for their distinctive liturgy (which I personally consider the weak leak in their chain.)

Next we consider partnerships in the active life of charity.

Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin

Co-founders of the Catholic Worker, Dorothy was the moving, charismatic force, the Mother of the movement; but she could never have done this without her mentoring by Peter in the Catholic tradition.

Catherine and Eddy Doherty

Catherine is the peer of Dorothy Day in her spiritual wisdom, activism and influence.  She founded Madonna House, not unlike the Catholic Worker.

She married Eddy Doherty, a renown journalist, in a "Josephite marriage," in which they both pledged sexual abstinence. Both had prior marriages (hers annulled as her husband was a cousin, in the Russian Orthodox Church) and had children in their previous marriages. Eddy became a permanent deacon. 

Next We Consider Marriages of Philosophers

Jacques and Raissa Maritain

Dietrich and Alice von Hildreband

These two marriages have striking similarities: contemporaries, the husbands knew each other. They are certainly two of the most accomplished, influential Catholic philosophers of the century. Both followed St. Thomas although Dietrich leaned more heavily into contemporary phenomenology and personalism. Both wives were substantial thinkers in their own right. Both marriages were Josephite: sexually abstinent, seeking fruition spiritually but not biologically. 

Next: the mystic and the atheist doctor.

Elizabeth  and Felix Leseur

This wife loved her hardcore atheist husband tenderly, passionately, and with immense suffering. Upon reading her memoir after her death, he converted, spent the remaining 30 years of his life as a Dominican priest, spreading the legacy of his wife.

Next: Professors and their Female Proteges

Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein (St. Theresa Benedicta of the Cross)

Ludwig Wittgenstein and Elizabeth Anscombe

Martin Heidegger and Hannah Arendt

Academic consensus surely holds Wittgenstein and Heidegger as the greatest philosophers of the century, with Husserl easily in the top ten. So, it is so striking that each had as their standout protege a female student of brilliance and moral/spiritual character. 

All three geniuses were detached from religion but moved by powerful spiritual sensibilities. Husserl converted to Lutherism from Judaism and retained a sense of awe as he pursued  philosophy detached from faith. Wittgenstein, secular but of Jewish descent,  likewise was moved by deep moral, spiritual motives as he detached from formal religion. Heidegger, raised a devout Catholic and attended seminary,  renounced the Catholic tradition of dogma and philosophy but proposed in his thought an alternate, non-theistic but strongly spiritual philosophy. All three renounced traditional Christian thought, but lived and taught their own philosophy as a faith or way of life.

Stein, like her mentor, converted from secular Judaism. She became  a brilliant Catholic thinke;, a Carmelite nun;  a martyr, for being Jewish, in Auschwicz; and a canonized saint. Like John Paul and Hildebrandt, she combined Thomism with modern phenomenology to offer a Catholicism that is contemporary, fresh and traditional.

Anscombe was a brilliant, hardcore Catholic who forcefully denounced the bombing of Hiroshima as well as the acceptance of contraception by many Catholic who rejected Pope Paul's Humanae Vitae.

Arendt was and remained Jewish, if in a secular fashion. Yet she was a profound, insightful moral thinker, astutely scrutinizing contemporary issues from a spiritual/ethical depth. She was student and romantic-sexual lover of Heidegger who was a Nazi. Strikingly, she later reconciled with  him in friendship, thus enacting forgiveness, a theme she also studied. 

In all three cases, the younger female protege excelled her more prestigious mentor in wisdom, moral character, and spiritual clarity. Clearly, the male geniuses, brilliant but not firmly grounded in the True and the Good, were fascinated by the interior-intellectual-spiritual loveliness of their students.

Conclusion

These twelve partnership have striking resemblances. 

- None bore biological children.

- Four were marriages, but three of those were Josephite, sexually abstinent. One entailed a non-marital sexual romance.

- All engaged deeply, passionately in spirituality, philosophy, active charity,

- Five were Jewish with four of them converting; one a Nazi; one remained a secular Jew. 

- Most exemplified the classic Catholic marriage of chastity, wisdom, simplicity of life, and closeness t the poor.

- We see in strikingly unique ways, the mutuality, fecundity and serendipity of the male/female encounter. Many (the Hildebrandts, John Paul, Edith Stein, Balthasar, Speyr) delved deeply into the mystery of sexuality/romance/masculinity/femininity/spousality/maternity/paternity. In them we are given the definitive response to the sterile, iconoclastic Cultural Liberalism afflicting our world.

We have here  mesmerizing personalities: radiant with brilliance, holiness, moral character, iconic in their masculinity and femininity, and resplendent in chastity, reverence, tenderness and heroism.

We do well to study them, ponder them, pray to them, and emulate them.


Friday, March 20, 2026

The Despair of the Progressive

It is palpable in the Opinion section of the Sunday NY Times: a sense of doom and desperation; democracy is being replaced by fascism; global warming about to destroy our planet; regressive populism is spreading across the globe. The faith of the progressive is in crisis.

This faith is in...progress. The famous "Arc of History!" The faith that "Progress" is the religious/metaphysical core of history and indeed reality. There are many versions but really two basic models: the evolutionary and the revolutionary. The evolutionary (Darwin, Whitehead, Chardin) sees a gradual, inevitable, imminent force in history/reality pushing forward to utopia and places immense trust in science, technology, education, therapy, reason, and diplomacy. The revolutionary (Hegel, Marx) posits the eternal dialectic of oppressor/oppressed by which the underdog is constantly in rebellion against oppression. The two obviously contradict each other; yet they coexist incoherently in various expressions of cultural liberalism.

This reality of progress is not a scientific discovery; not a revelation from the eternal; not a metaphysical intuition. It is a myth. Actually, the core dogma of secular progressivism. It is organically connected to other myths: gender as self-choice; the sacrosanct right of a mother to kill her unborn child; the contraceptive rupture of sex from having children; the omnipotence of science/technology; masculinity/patriarchy as toxic;  "born that way" homosexuality; systemic racism; the messianic role of the maternal state; and the sovereignty of the isolated Self over all bonds of community, history, religion and family. 

This pandemic of despair, anxiety, hysteria, and rage is often diagnosed as TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome. But it is surely deeper than a response to this pathetic, manic, histrionic egomaniac. He has been on a tear for over a year, but is already being restrained and will be out of the picture within two years. 

The fear is deeper: that the sacral "arc of history" has been stopped, or diverted, or inverted, or nullified. The historic significance of Trump is that he halted that allegedly inexorable direction of history. 

But it is much more than him.

- With the advance of technology (cell phones, social media, etc.) we are seeing a decline in learning outcomes.

- With the availability of therapy, we see increase in mental health problems.

- With the eruption of bad actors we see the irrelevance of diplomacy and the United Nations. 

- In resisting evidence of the lab origin of Covid, "follow the science" guru Dr. Fauci has been unveiled as a partisan manipulator.  

- Climate, the most pressing concern of liberals, is displaced by pressing needs for energy due to wars and emergent AI. 

-Shootings continue but gun control makes no real progress across the nation. 

- Critical race theory has proven to be a dead end, widely rejected by the working class, including many of color.

- The imminent demographic winter, which spares the more religious and generative of us, is ominous for the secular culture of sterile, non-generous sex. 

- Perhaps worst of all: it is the underclass, the workers, the uneducated and deprived who are choosing rightwing populists like Trump in valid democratic elections. 

Trust in a secular ameliorative process inherent to history and reality is being destroyed in every arena. The "god of progress" is...if not dead...fatally wounded. Furthermore,  progressivism, largely secular,  lacks the comfort available to religious conservatives, a transcendent, eternal life beyond this one.

The Catholic Progressive

Let's distinguish the Catholic Progressive from the Progressive Catholic. The noun or substantive is the defining inner form: the CP is progressive interiorly, with a Catholic flavor; the PC is here understood as basically Catholic in foundational moral/theological beliefs but leaning left on pragmatic, political issues. And so the Catholic Progressive accepts contraception, the technology of reproduction, legal abortion, female priests, transgenderism, and the LGBTQ agenda. Substantive Catholics share fundamental truths, but may differ as progressive/conservative/radical on prudential issues such as: immigration, capital punishment, taxes, environmental policy, diplomacy and specific wars as just.

The Catholic Progressive configures classic Catholicism as fundamentally erroneous and hateful as patriarchal, homophobic, judgmental, and authoritarian. The authentic Catholic...liberal, conservative, radical, or other...affirms Catholic dogma and morals but retains freedom of conscience in considering practical policies that do not involve inherent evils.  

 It is clear that the Vatican and American bishops lean left on many of these issues; but that practical evaluation is not guaranteed by the Holy Spirit and not binding on the conscience of the Catholic laity. A Catholic layman might well consider but then reject magisterial opinion and serve on ICE, or in Iran, or as prosecutor/judge in a capital punishment case.

The pontificate of Francis was a happy one for the progressive Catholic: it left in place basic dogma but mostly favored the liberal policy agenda. Not so much for the Catholic Progressive: he aroused hope for change but remained confusing/contradictory and in the end did not change church teaching. This will be even more pronounced with Leo: his sympathies are with the Left on policy issues. His pledge to follow the direction of Francis suggests a softness on dogma and morals. In temperament and attitude he is mediator, a peace maker, a compromiser. But he is also a canon lawyer, an institutionalist, concerned with Church stability. He is less likely than Francis to change basic teaching, even as he is less clear and forceful as teacher than many of us desire.

What Do We Make of This?

Yuval Levin has helpfully shown that in the Culture War, neither side is able to prevail against the other. The sides are roughly equivalent, although there is a pendelum swing from one election to another. Both sides share an anxiety that their side is in danger of extinction. 

With this in mind, we do well as conservatives to take a deep breath, relax, and enjoy a degree of relief from anxiety/anger,  serenity and confidence. In many ways the war is a stalemate, like Ukraine/Russia. But in the long run we have the advantage. Our values are perennial, eternal, rooted in the moral order and Revelation. Our fertility, biological/spiritual/intellectual, is superior. The progressive paradigm is sterile, fragile, sentimental, and futile. 

This posture of interior peace allows us patience, hope and persistence. It allows compassion for the progressive in his affliction of despair. It even allows us to listen respectfully and affirm the truth offered by our distressed antagonist. It awakens a desire for reconciliation and movement ever deeper into the True, the Good and the Beautiful. 

Thursday, March 19, 2026

Cesar Chavez: a Fallen Hero

 I received with piercing sadness, yesterday, the NY Times investigative reporting that Cesar Chavez had not only habits of adultery but that he abused teenage girls and even raped his colleague of many years, Delores Huerta. Huerta, now 95 years old, carried this secret for about 60 years, to protect the legacy she shared with Chavez. 

This struck me in a personal way. In my late adolescence and even early married life Chavez was for me a hero figure as a historic labor leader, a father figure for Mexican-American farm workers, but also an exemplary Catholic in his prayer, fasts and Eucharistic devotion. Early in our marriage we would boycott supermarkets that carried non-union grapes. Our first daughter, around age 2, referred to grapes as "boycotts." 

He is the last of a series of personal heroes, in the public life, who have fallen off the pedestal: JFK, MLK, Fr. Bruce Ritter, Jean Vanier are others. Each represented for me historic greatness and moral goodness. Yet, in their treatment of women they were depraved. Worse was the abuse of the young. And also worse was the combination with spiritual abuse and manipulation. 

As I type this, at 2 AM, unable to sleep, I feel dirty myself. It is as if I had collaborated with him in my hero worship. Or as if this was done by my own father or son.

Any More Heroes?

Do we have today, in public life (as distinct from the Church), any moral heroes? I think of one: Jimmy Lai, the Catholic Hong Kong millionaire publisher in jail for defending freedom. He is a hero. 

I cannot think of any other heroes of the moment. But we do have decent, moral exemplars in our public life. 

By my Catholic values, advocacy for legal abortion is a moral contamination similar to membership in the KKK or the Nazi Party: systemic evil. So I cannot admire any Democratic politician of the last 60 or so years. The last authentically prolife Democrats were: Sargent Shriver, the older Governor Casey of Pennsylvania, and Mayor Ray Flynn of Boston. Even Hubert Humphry, Eugene McCarthy, Walter Mondale, and Jimmy Carter were compromised on this issue as the tide was turning approaching 1970. 

Happily, we do have a number of public figures with moral integrity. (What follows is not an endorsement of their politics, but of their personal decency, however imperfect.)  Ronald Reagan, both George Bushes, Gerald Ford, William Buckley, Nicki Halley, Condoleza Rice, Ron DeSantis, JD Vance, Marco Rubio, William Barr, Paul Ryan, Justices Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Barrett, Denzel Washington, and Tom Hanks

Going back to my own childhood and youth, we can admire: Dwight Eisenhower, Harry Truman (although dropping the bomb is a problem), George Meany, Gregory Peck, and Adlai Stevenson. 

Globally we think of: Nelson Mandela, Gandhi, Winston Churchill, Dag Hamarskjold, Antonio Salazar of Portugal, Desmond Tutu, Nyerere of Tanzania, and Margaret Thatcher.

These 36 figures are not morally perfect. Many of their policies, decisions and values are problematic. But they all maintained a private and public decency and dignity, qualities desperately needed in leadership today. 

Catholic World

Within the Church, we have been blessed (again, within my lifetime) with extraordinary people, some canonized, to emulate: St. Mother Theresa, St. John Paul, St. Padre Pio, St. Pope John 23, St. Paul 6, Luigi Giusanni, Pope Benedict, Mother Angelica, Monsignor Luigi Giussani, Chiara Lubich, Dorothy Day, Catherine Doherty, Adrienne von Speyr, Madaleine del Brell, Caryl Houselander, St. Fulton Sheen, Cardinal Van Thuan, Archbishop Luis Martinez, Bishop Barron, Father Patrick Peyton, 

We have others still living with us. But I decline to name them. They are still vulnerable to sin. Perhaps specially targeted by Lucifer. "The higher they climb, the further they fall." The memory of Cesar Chavez moves us to pray for the living, even those most admirable. 

Conclusion

We remember Cesar Chavez today with deep sadness. Sad for the young, trusting women who continue to suffer from this abuse. Sad for his sin, his disrespect for women, his public hypocrisy. 

We pray for his soul.

We pray for ourselves: "Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil."

We celebrate today, as I type, the feast of St. Joseph. May his intercession and influence make us chaste, loyal, fatherly, strong yet gentle.